Our spring sale is on! Use promo code SPRING24 at checkout to save 50% on any order!

Constituting Workers, Protecting Women

Gender, Law and Labor in the Progressive Era and New Deal Years

Subjects: Law, History, American History, Political Science, American Politics, Gender Studies, Women's Studies, Class Studies
Open Access : 9780472904211, 336 pages, 1 drawing, 14 tables, 6 x 9, June 2023
Hardcover : 9780472111985, 336 pages, 1 drawing, 14 tables, 6 x 9, July 2001

This open-access version is made available with the support of Big Ten Academic Alliance member libraries.
See expanded detail +

Studies historical constitutional development in relation to protective laws for women in the U.S. during the Progressive Era and early New Deal years

Look Inside

Copyright © 2001, University of Michigan. All rights reserved.


Constitutional considerations of protective laws for women were the analytical battlefield on which the legal community reworked the balance between private liberty and the state's authority to regulate. Julie Novkov focuses on the importance of gender as an analytical category for the legal system.
During the Progressive Era and New Deal, courts often invalidated generalized protective legislation, but frequently upheld measures that limited women's terms and conditions of labor. The book explores the reasoning in such cases that were decided between 1873 and 1937. By analyzing all reported opinion on the state and federal level, as well as materials from the women's movement and briefs filed in the U.S. Supreme Court, the study demonstrates that considerations of cases involving women's measures ultimately came to drive the development of doctrine.
The study combines historical institutionalism and feminism to address constitutional interpretation, showing that an analysis of conflict over the meaning of legal categories provides a deeper understanding of constitutional development. In doing so, it rejects purely political interpretations of the so-called Lochner era, in which the courts invalidated many legislative efforts to ameliorate the worst effects of capitalism. By addressing the dynamic interactions among interested laypersons, attorneys, and judges, it demonstrates that no individuals or institutions have complete control over the generation of constitutional meaning.
Julie Novkov is Assistant Professor of Political Science, University of Oregon

Julie Novkov is Associate Professor of Political Science and Women's Studies at University of Albany, SUNY.