The CAWP Series in Gender and American Politics (Series)

The CAWP Series in Gender and American Politics publishes innovative work on gender and politics. The editors invite manuscripts that push the boundaries of current thinking about the intersection of gender and politics; that demonstrate the centrality of gender to our understanding of American democracy; that are attentive to linkages among theory, empirical analysis, and political practice; and that study underrepresented groups and under-researched topics within the field of women and politics. They encourage work that recognizes how other categories of analysis, including race, ethnicity, class, and sexuality, help to constitute and inform gender politics. The series is open to a variety of methodological approaches and favors projects that employ multiple or innovative methods.

Showing 1 to 9 of 9 results.

Walking the Gendered Tightrope

Theresa May and Nancy Pelosi as Legislative Leaders

Examines how women in higher office must balance feminine stereotypes with exercising their power

Gendered Pluralism

Examines the extent to which gender influences the political policy views and attitudes of women

Who Runs?

The Masculine Advantage in Candidate Emergence

Gender, not sex, is a key factor in who runs for political office

The Paradox of Gender Equality

How American Women's Groups Gained and Lost Their Public Voice

New Edition, With a New Preface

A challenge to conventional notions about American women’s collective engagement in public policy-making

The Changing Face of Representation

The Gender of U.S. Senators and Constituent Communications

Gender matters in communication, media portrayals, and citizens' attitudes toward senators

The Paradox of Gender Equality

How American Women's Groups Gained and Lost Their Public Voice

1st Edition

A challenge to conventional notions about American women's collective engagement in public policy-making

When Protest Makes Policy

How Social Movements Represent Disadvantaged Groups

Do social movements lead to more inclusive democracy or to a more polarized, fragmented, elite-dominated polity?